Our method
Independence
We sell nothing. No products, no affiliate links, no sponsored posts, no display ads, no vendor money. When you read a page here, no one paid for the conclusion — which means we have nothing to protect except being right.
What "sells nothing" actually means
- No products. We don't make, brand, or resell peptides or supplements.
- No affiliate links. We earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. We generally don't link to vendors at all.
- No sponsored content. No company can pay to appear, rank higher, or soften how we describe their compound.
- No ads. No display network deciding what you see next to the research.
- No "clinical" claims for sale. A manufacturer's marketing is treated as marketing, never as evidence.
Why this is the whole point
Most of the internet's peptide information is written by someone who wants to sell you a peptide. That's the conflict that quietly bends every "review": the site that profits from the answer is not a neutral place to ask the question. We removed the conflict entirely. There is no product page for our verdict to point toward, so the verdict can just tell you what the research shows — including "the evidence is thin" or "no human has ever been studied on this," which are answers a store can't afford to give.
How we keep it honest
Independence only counts if it's verifiable, so we back it with the rest of our method: real primary sources on every claim, honest evidence tiers, dated regulatory status, and a named human author who stands behind the page. It all connects — see the editorial policy andhow we grade evidence.
If that ever changes
Right now the site runs on zero commercial relationships, and we'd rather keep it that way. If we ever add a way to fund the work — a tool, a supporter option, an honest partnership — we will disclose it plainly, on this page, before it goes live, and we will never let it change how a compound gets graded. The evidence decides the verdict. Nothing else gets a vote.
Educational information, not medical advice.